He done baptized a baby.
sarah on January 26th, 2006 at 4:35 pm
do you find out what you’re having?
Sarah Jones Mosley on January 26th, 2006 at 4:38 pm
Nope. Nooo! I love Eko! (Haven’t yet seen the newest episode, though.)
Archer on January 26th, 2006 at 8:00 pm
Eko is a catholic priest, therefore I think he is one of the Others. I bet a good guy (relatively speaking!) like Jack is a presbyterian or southern baptist. sweet. Archer
Sarah Jones Mosley on January 26th, 2006 at 8:25 pm
Archer! Eko is not a Catholic priest. He merely went back to his brother’s church after his brother’s death and assumed his brother’s role. He’s a heretical imposter.
Archer on January 26th, 2006 at 8:27 pm
oh..I thought he went back and became a real one after the whole drug incident. Oh well!
daniel silliman on January 26th, 2006 at 11:22 pm
I gotta remember to year the title of your posts. I had no idea what was going on.
daniel silliman on January 27th, 2006 at 1:40 pm
*read.
Sarah Jones Mosley on January 27th, 2006 at 4:02 pm
You and I were totally the urban rendition of LOST. Is this a rant against lay baptism? Or against the idea that Christ’s sins were washed away? Or something else. I think the reference to Christ’s sins was a slip, though I wouldn’t put that idea past John Locke. Locke is the real evil one.
Nathanael on February 7th, 2006 at 9:00 am
The rant was against this line by Mr. Eko: “It is said that when John the Baptist baptized Jesus the skies opened up and a dove flew down from the sky. This told John something — that he had cleansed this man of all his sins. That he had freed him. Heaven came much later.” We were watching _Dogma_ the other night, and the same sort of line came up - the idea that Jesus was not truly God and truly man for His entire life, but that His God-hood came with His baptism. Isn’t that rather Ubiquitarian? (see “Hypostatic Union” at the end of the page) Post a comment
Comment moderation is in use. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly. |
|