I’m going to rile my T. Pres. friends and say that I liked The Constant Gardener. I read the book a couple summers ago and just watched the film this weekend. The differences between the two did not seem to be significant, and I thought the movie was well-made. Comments?
Update:
I am not sure that the use of flashbacks in the beginning of the film was necessary. I mean, it establishes that she dies very early on, but I don’t think that I should know that. Or, if the director wants to show me that this is all the memory of Justin, then why does he differentiate between the entire first half of the film and the memories that Justin has when visiting the Chelsea house? Why use two different techniques for what should be the same sort of memories.
Update #2:
I wonder when someone will make a film about this?